CaseLaw
This ruling is sequel to a motion dated the 28th July, 2010 and filed on the 291h of July, 2010. Motion prays for:-
The grounds for the reliefs sought in the application are set out in 11 paragraphs. The application is supported by an affidavit of 25 paragraphs to which were attached Exhibits SCK 1. SCK2. SCK3, SCK4. SCK5. SCK6. SCK7, SCK8, SCK9, SCK10, SCK11 and SCK12. On that same 29th of July, 2010, the 2nd plaintiff/applicant deposed to an affidavit of urgency of 26 paragraphs. The facts deposed to are substantially the same as those he deposed to in the 25 paragraph affidavit in support of the motion.
In opposition to the application, Mr. Ayo Adesanmi counsel in the Law Firm of Chief Wole Olanipekun, SAN for and on behalf of the 1st _ 3rd defendants/respondents (who are respondents herein) deposed to a counter affidavit of 94 paragraphs to which were attached Exhibits 1- 23, This was on the 13/10/2010. On that same day, on behalf of the 1st - 3rd respondents, Chief Wole Olanipekun, SAN filed a notice of preliminary objection to urge the dismissal or 8 striking out of the motion. The grounds of the preliminary objection are that:-