CaseLaw
The facts giving rise to this appeal are simple and straightforward. They include the following:
On the 14th day of April, 2007 Governorship and State House of Assembly elections were conducted in Nigeria, including Imo State, by the 2nd respondent (INEC) which has the constitutional responsibility to do so. At the conclusion of the election, the 2nd and 3rd respondents upheld and/or validated the results of the State House of Assembly election in Imo State while the election in relation to the Governorship of Imo State was cancelled. The reasons for the alleged cancellation were given by the 3rd respondent to include violence, thuggery etc in 9 out of 27 Local Government Areas of Imo State. The election results upheld by the 2nd and 3rd respondents in respect of the State House of Assembly of Imo State also held on 14th April 2007 included the results declared in the 9 Local Government Areas allegedly affected by thuggery, violence and other electoral offences. In both elections, the same ballot boxes, officials etc. were used in the conduct of the elections of 14th April, 2007. Appellant 1st respondent and other candidates contested the Imo State Governorship election of 14th April, 2007 which, as earlier stated, was cancelled by the 2nd and 3rd respondents for being inconclusive.
Meanwhile, the 2nd and 3rd respondents rescheduled Imo State Governorship election for the 28th day of April. 2007.
On the 19th day of April, 2007, the 1st respondent instituted an action at the Federal High Court, Abuja by way of judicial review, in which he claimed the following reliefs:-