Disable Preloader

CaseLaw

David V. COP Plateau State (2018) CLR 7(f) (SC)

Judgement delivered on July 6th 2018

Brief

  • Section 224 Penal Code
  • Sentence
  • Self defence
  • Conviction under wrong law
  • Section 221 of the Penal Code Law of Plateau State
  • Section 221(a) of the Penal Code
  • Section 221(1) of the Penal Code Law of Plateau State
  • Section 224 of the Penal Code
  • Section 59 the Penal Code
  • Section 222(1) of the Penal Code
  • Section 15 of the Court of Appeal Act 2004

Facts

The Appellant was charged and tried for culpable homicide punishable with death under Section 221 of the Penal Code Law of Plateau State. At the trial he raised defences of self-defence and provocation which did not impress the trial Court. His defences were dismissed. He was convicted as charged and sentenced to death. He appealed, and the Court of Appeal (the lower Court) however found, at pages 226 - 227 of the Record, that:

on the evidence before the lower Court, especially Exhibit 1, 2 and the testimony of PW.1 and the Appellant at the trial, the defence of provocation has been established to warrant its application to reduce offence of culpable homicide punishable with death under Section 221(a) (of the Penal Code) to the other homicide not punishable with death under Section 222(1) of the Penal Code. For the law is settled, where the defence of provocation succeeds, the punishment for committing the offence under Section 221(a) of the Penal Code cannot be death but such offender is to be sentenced under Section 222(1) of the penal Code.

Accordingly, the death sentence imposed on the Appellant, upon his being convicted for culpable homicide punishable with death, was set aside and in its stead the Appellant was "sentenced to life imprisonment under Section 222(1) of the Penal Code." It is against this judgment of the lower Court that the Appellant has further appealed to this Court. The Respondent, as the Prosecutor, presumably accepting the decision, has not appealed it.

Issues

  • 1
    Whether the learned Justices of the Court of Appeal were right to have held...
Read More