Disable Preloader

CaseLaw

Awote V. Owodunni (1986) CLR 12(a) (SC)

Judgement delivered on December 12th 1986

Brief

  • Grounds of appeal
  • Issue not raised at trial

Facts

In the Grade A Customary Court, Ijebu-Ode, the appellants, as plaintiffs, instituted an action against the respondents, claiming as follows:

  • i
    Declaration of title in accordance with customary law to all that piece or parcel of land situate, lying and being along Ijebu-Ode/Ibadan Road, Ijebu-Ode (at the back of Chief T. A. Odutola’s compound, Ijebu-Ode) as they property of the plaintiffs’ family, to wit, the Oliwo Agbadagbodo Family (otherwise known as and called Olore Family) of Ijasi Quarter, Ijebu-Ode, Western State of Nigeria.

The value of the said land is £250 (Two Hundred and Fifty pounds).

  • ii
    £250 (Two Hundred and Fifty pounds) being general damages for the trespass committed on the said land by the defendant on or about the 21st day of June, 1968 and
  • iii
    Injunction restraining the defendant, his agents, servants or assigns from any further acts of trespass on the said land.”

At the trial, both parties gave evidence of traditional history, as well as evidence of acts of ownership, in support of their respective claims. At the end of the day, the learned President of the Customary Court, after giving due consideration to the evidence led, held that the plaintiffs had failed to establish their case. He therefore dismissed the plaintiffs’ claims in their entirely. It is pertinent to note, that one of the reasons given by the trial court for dismissing the 5 claims of the plaintiffs was their failure to prove satisfactorily, some of the boundaries of the land they were claiming.

Being dissatisfied with the decision of the trial Customary Court, the plaintiffs appealed to the Ijebu-Ode High Court, and their appeal was allowed, and a declaration was made in their favour. The defendants (respondents herein), appealed to the Court of Appeal against the decision of the High Court, and the Court of Appeal, by a unanimous decision given on the 25th August, 1985, allowed their appeal. The present appeal in this court is against the decision of the Court of Appeal.

Issues

  • 1
    Whether a respondent has a right to object to a ground of appeal on the
  • Read More